Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

APRES: An Agentic Paper Revision and Evaluation System

Scientific discoveries must be communicated clearly to realize their full potential. Without effective communication, even the most groundbreaking findings risk being overlooked or misunderstood. The primary way scientists communicate their work and receive feedback from the community is through peer review. However, the current system often provides inconsistent feedback between reviewers, ultimately hindering the improvement of a manuscript and limiting its potential impact. In this paper, we introduce a novel method APRES powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) to update a scientific papers text based on an evaluation rubric. Our automated method discovers a rubric that is highly predi...

AuthorsBingchen Zhao, Jenny Zhang, Chenxi Whitehouse et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published3 March 2026
Last updated at source3 March 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/c5ac5ddf-39d2-4014-9b8e-2a9dcc165a67" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.