Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Why Adam Can Beat SGD: Second-Moment Normalization Yields Sharper Tails

Despite Adam demonstrating faster empirical convergence than SGD in many applications, much of the existing theory yields guarantees essentially comparable to those of SGD, leaving the empirical performance gap insufficiently explained. In this paper, we uncover a key second-moment normalization in Adam and develop a stopping-time/martingale analysis that provably distinguishes Adam from SGD under the classical bounded variance model (a second moment assumption). In particular, we establish the first theoretical separation between the high-probability convergence behaviors of the two methods: Adam achieves a $δ^{-1/2}$ dependence on the confidence parameter $δ$, whereas corresponding high...

AuthorsRuinan Jin, Yingbin Liang, Shaofeng Zou
Primary categorycs.LG
Published3 March 2026
Last updated at source18 May 2026
cs.LGcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/a44caf9a-65c5-4acd-b94c-911daeee71d8" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.