Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

TrustMH-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating the Trustworthiness of Large Language Models in Mental Health

While Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate significant potential in providing accessible mental health support, their practical deployment raises critical trustworthiness concerns due to the domains high-stakes and safety-sensitive nature. Existing evaluation paradigms for general-purpose LLMs fail to capture mental health-specific requirements, highlighting an urgent need to prioritize and enhance their trustworthiness. To address this, we propose TrustMH-Bench, a holistic framework designed to systematically quantify the trustworthiness of mental health LLMs. By establishing a deep mapping from domain-specific norms to quantitative evaluation metrics, TrustMH-Bench evaluates models ...

AuthorsZixin Xiong, Ziteng Wang, Haotian Fan et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published3 March 2026
Last updated at source3 March 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/ef793ad5-5090-4ae5-a2c7-e0ab97ca1481" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.