Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Agentified Assessment of Logical Reasoning Agents

We present a framework for evaluating and benchmarking logical reasoning agents when assessment itself must be reproducible, auditable, and robust to execution failures. Building on agentified assessment, we use an assessor agent to issue tasks, enforce execution budgets, parse outputs, and record structured failure types, while the agent under test only needs to expose a standardized agent-to-agent interface. As a case study, we benchmark an auto-formalization agent for first-order logic (FOL) reasoning on a solver-verified and repaired split of FOLIO. The agent translates natural language premises and conclusions into executable Z3Py programs and employs satisfiability modulo theories (...

AuthorsZhiyu Ni, Yifeng Xiao, Zheng Liang
Primary categorycs.AI
Published3 March 2026
Last updated at source2 April 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/a584a74f-6b9e-42ff-b973-4e04f7114f81" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.