Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Credibility Governance: A Social Mechanism for Collective Self-Correction under Weak Truth Signals

Online platforms increasingly rely on opinion aggregation to allocate real-world attention and resources, yet common signals such as engagement votes or capital-weighted commitments are easy to amplify and often track visibility rather than reliability. This makes collective judgments brittle under weak truth signals, noisy or delayed feedback, early popularity surges, and strategic manipulation. We propose Credibility Governance (CG), a mechanism that reallocates influence by learning which agents and viewpoints consistently track evolving public evidence. CG maintains dynamic credibility scores for both agents and opinions, updates opinion influence via credibility-weighted endorsements...

AuthorsWanying He, Yanxi Lin, Ziheng Zhou et al.
Primary categorycs.CY
Published3 March 2026
Last updated at source3 March 2026
cs.CYcs.AIcs.CLcs.MAcs.SI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/94a15b59-a029-4c61-9319-5868d901e8f7" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.