Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

When Bigger is Worse: A Practitioner's Guide to Model Selection Under Data Scarcity

Scaling laws assume larger models trained on more data consistently outperform smaller ones -- an assumption that drives model selection in computer vision but remains untested in resource-constrained Earth observation (EO). We conduct a systematic efficiency analysis across three scaling dimensions: model size, dataset size, and input resolution, on rooftop photovoltaic (PV) detection in Madagascar, yielding 180 training runs across 60 configurations. Optimizing for model efficiency (mAP$_{50}$ per unit of model size), we find a consistent efficiency inversion: YOLO11N achieves the highest efficiency ($22\times$ higher than YOLO11X) with no accuracy penalty: it reaches the second highest...

AuthorsKwame Mbobda-Kuate, Gabriel Kasmi
Primary categorycs.CV
Published2 March 2026
Last updated at source17 July 2026
cs.CVcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/ec7cc1df-205f-4adb-8313-97b1de75fe48" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.