CyclicJudge: Mitigating Judge Bias Efficiently in LLM-based Evaluation
LLM-as-judge evaluation has become standard practice for open-ended model assessment; however, judges exhibit systematic biases that cannot be averaged out by increasing the number of scenarios or generations. These biases are often similar in magnitude to the model differences that benchmarks are designed to detect, resulting in unreliable rankings when single-judge evaluations are used. We introduce a variance decomposition that partitions benchmark score variance into scenario, generation, judge, and residual components. Based on this analysis, CyclicJudge, a round-robin assignment of judges to scenarios, is demonstrated to be the optimal strategy for a fixed judge panel and judge-call...
| Authors | Ziyi Zhu, Olivier Tieleman, Alexey Bukhtiyarov et al. |
|---|---|
| Primary category | cs.CL |
| Published | 2 March 2026 |
| Last updated at source | 4 May 2026 |
Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.