Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Probing Materials Knowledge in LLMs: From Latent Embeddings to Reliable Predictions

Large language models are increasingly applied to materials science, yet fundamental questions remain about their reliability and knowledge encoding. Evaluating 25 LLMs across four materials science tasks -- over 200 base and fine-tuned configurations -- we find that output modality fundamentally determines model behavior. For symbolic tasks, fine-tuning converges to consistent, verifiable answers with reduced response entropy, while for numerical tasks, fine-tuning improves prediction accuracy but models remain inconsistent across repeated inference runs, limiting their reliability as quantitative predictors. For numerical regression, we find that better performance can be obtained by ex...

AuthorsVineeth Venugopal, Soroush Mahjoubi, Elsa Olivetti
Primary categorycond-mat.mtrl-sci
Published2 March 2026
Last updated at source2 March 2026
cond-mat.mtrl-scics.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/eb723cb1-12cd-4b48-a5a1-77310dcc74de" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.