Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Position: Evaluation of Visual Processing Should Be Human-Centered, Not Metric-Centered

This position paper argues that the evaluation of modern visual processing systems should no longer be driven primarily by single-metric image quality assessment benchmarks, particularly in the era of generative and perception-oriented methods. Image restoration exemplifies this divergence: while objective IQA metrics enable reproducible, scalable evaluation, they have increasingly drifted apart from human perception and user preferences. We contend that this mismatch risks constraining innovation and misguiding research progress across visual processing tasks. Rather than rejecting metrics altogether, this paper calls for a rebalancing of evaluation paradigms, advocating a more human-cen...

AuthorsJinfan Hu, Fanghua Yu, Zhiyuan You et al.
Primary categorycs.CV
Published28 February 2026
Last updated at source7 March 2026
cs.CV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/baf447df-7790-4c6a-a50d-0a9b66869438" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.