When RL Meets Adaptive Speculative Training: A Unified Training-Serving System
Speculative decoding can significantly accelerate LLM serving, yet most deployments today disentangle speculator training from serving, treating speculator training as a standalone offline modeling problem. We show that this decoupled formulation introduces substantial deployment and adaptation lag: (1) high time-to-serve, since a speculator must be trained offline for a considerable period before deployment; (2) delayed utility feedback, since the true end-to-end decoding speedup is only known after training and cannot be inferred reliably from acceptance rate alone due to model-architecture and system-level overheads; and (3) domain-drift degradation, as the target model is repurposed t...
| Authors | Junxiong Wang, Fengxiang Bie, Jisen Li et al. |
|---|---|
| Primary category | cs.LG |
| Published | 6 February 2026 |
| Last updated at source | 4 August 2026 |
Popularity, last 2 days
0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.
Connected in the knowledge graph
- togethercomputer/Aurora-Spec-Qwen3-Coder-Next-FP8Model · cited by
- togethercomputer/Aurora-Spec-Minimax-M2.1Model · cited by
- togethercomputer/Aurora-Spec-Minimax-M2.5Model · cited by
Models and datasets referencing this paper
Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 19 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.