Sign inGet started
Dataset · Hugging Face

stanjsx/LLMPeerReview

LLM Reviewers Err Together Code, data and raw model outputs for a study of whether a committee of LLM reviewers provides the independent perspectives that a committee of human reviewers does. Nine models from five families review 700 ICLR 2025, NeurIPS 2023 and ICML 2025 submissions under four scoring settings, and nine models act as area chairs on 60 of the papers. Findings this repository reproduces: pooling 24 model reviews of a paper still leaves 24.7% of human-raised… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/stanjsx/LLMPeerReview.

Author / organizationstanjsx
Downloads5.2K (as reported by Hugging Face)
Likes1
Created11 August 2026
Last updated at source21 September 2026
peer-reviewllm-evaluationllm-as-a-judge
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/d6a858ea-9aa6-4e96-819e-35b09b370717" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

More from stanjsx

Silytics shows public metadata from Hugging Face and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 16 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.