Sign inGet started
Dataset · Hugging Face

kitan-liyah/legal_eval

Negation Blind Spots in Legal AI: A Hands-On Evaluation 1. The Blind Spot: Why "Not" Changes Everything While building a legal AI copilot, I kept running into the same dangerous failure mode: if a user asked, "Is the vendor liable for damages?", the system would confidently retrieve and rank a clause stating the vendor is not liable. To a standard AI retriever, "liable" and "not liable" look almost identical. They share the same keywords and occupy the same space… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/kitan-liyah/legal_eval.

Author / organizationkitan-liyah
Downloads0 (as reported by Hugging Face)
Likes0
Created16 October 2026
Last updated at source16 October 2026
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/c90ba977-088e-4687-93f2-f2fc346dc5ed" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Recent changes

  • 16 Oct 2026 Description: none → Negation Blind Spots in Legal AI: A Hands-On Evaluation 1. The Blind Spot: Why "Not" Changes Everything While building a legal AI copilot, I kept running into the same dangerous failure mode: if a user asked, "Is the vendor liable for damag

Changes detected by Silytics between refreshes of the source.

Silytics shows public metadata from Hugging Face and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 16 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.