Sign inGet started
Dataset · Hugging Face

diarizers-community/synthetic-speaker-diarization-dataset-fa-3000

Diarization Benchmark Results We evaluated two speaker diarization systems on the Synthetic Speaker Diarization Dataset (Farsi), containing 2,976 audio samples with speaker labels and reference segment timestamps. Performance Comparison Model Diarization Error Rate (DER) ↓ Real-Time Factor (RTF) ↓ NVIDIA Nemotron-3-Diarization 9.22% 0.00875 pyannote/speaker-diarization-3.1 50.11% 0.04431 Key findings: Lower diarization error:… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/diarizers-community/synthetic-speaker-diarization-dataset-fa-3000.

Author / organizationdiarizers-community
License (as declared)mit
Downloads265 (as reported by Hugging Face)
Likes4
Created2 June 2025
Last updated at source11 October 2026
segmentationdiarization
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/d087cdda-0926-4330-86d3-f1731323fb14" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 4 days

265 now (+34 since 2026-10-16). Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

More from diarizers-community

Silytics shows public metadata from Hugging Face and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 19 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.