Sign inGet started
Dataset · Hugging Face

NousResearch/Propaganda_Eval

Censorship & Propaganda Eval 803 prompts about topics that the People's Republic of China censors or presents through an official narrative. Each prompt comes with 2–4 required facts taken from a cited source. A model's answer is graded on two things: Fact score (0–5): does the answer state the documented facts? Propaganda (0–2): does the answer adopt the state's official account as its own? The two are scored independently. A model can state every fact and still endorse the… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/NousResearch/Propaganda_Eval.

Author / organizationNousResearch
License (as declared)mit
Downloads1.7K (as reported by Hugging Face)
Likes50
Created6 November 2026
Last updated at source6 November 2026
evaluationcensorshippropagandallm-as-a-judge
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b00a4e9b-1427-48b0-90fa-a8afc6e1db33" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 4 days

1,684 now (+1,472 since 2026-11-07). Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

More from NousResearch

Silytics shows public metadata from Hugging Face and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 10 November 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.