ClarusC64/autonomous-driving-catastrophic-plausible-alternative-identification-v0.1
What this dataset tests Whether a system can identify the most dangerous coherent alternative within a counterfactual scenario tree. Danger is defined as: high plausibility high collapse severity short recovery window. Required outputs most_dangerous_branch_id initiating_agent trigger_action time_to_instability_s prevention_leverage_point countermeasure_suggestion Scoring conventions time_to_instability is seconds prevention leverage point names the earliest controllable step… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/autonomous-driving-catastrophi
| Author / organization | ClarusC64 |
|---|---|
| License (as declared) | mit |
| Downloads | 127 (as reported by Hugging Face) |
| Likes | 0 |
| Created | 6 February 2026 |
| Last updated at source | 6 February 2026 |
Popularity, last 2 days
127 now (-1 since 2026-10-16). Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.
More from ClarusC64
- ClarusC64/clinical-stability-benchmarkDataset
- ClarusC64/maritime-bunker-consumption-voyage-plan-coherence-risk-v0.1Dataset
- ClarusC64/autonomous-driving-human-vehicle-coupling-coherence-scoring-v0.1Dataset
- ClarusC64/autonomous-driving-driver-vehicle-coherence-optimal-policy-selection-v0.1Dataset
- ClarusC64/autonomous-driving-driver-state-manifold-estimation-v0.1Dataset
- ClarusC64/autonomous-driving-counterfactual-branch-generation-v0.1Dataset
Silytics shows public metadata from Hugging Face and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.