Sign inGet started
Dataset · Hugging Face

AgentsSci/NeurIPS26_Precise-but-Uncoupled

Precise but Uncoupled Reviewer Precision Does Not Guarantee Critique Uptake in Multi-Agent Math Reasoning Accepted to NeurIPS 2026 — Main Track Protocol traces, process metrics and derived tables for the paper. Reviewer detection quality and successful critique uptake are empirically separable: a multi-agent protocol can identify errors accurately and still fail to change the answer it carries forward. Resource Link 📄 Paper arXiv:2607.15388 · PDF 🌐… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/AgentsSci/NeurIPS26_Precise-but-Uncoupled.

Author / organizationAgentsSci
License (as declared)other
Downloads147 (as reported by Hugging Face)
Likes0
Created23 September 2026
Last updated at source24 September 2026
multi-agentllm-agentsmathematical-reasoningscientific-reasoningcritiqueself-correctionreasoning-tracesevaluation
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/a5465771-1da8-4eb2-b38b-a507b48e5f81" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

147 now (+7 since 2026-10-16). Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Connected in the knowledge graph

Explore this entry in the graph

Related papers

More from AgentsSci

Silytics shows public metadata from Hugging Face and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.